Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Al Gore Still Won't Talk About Meat

Tuesday 09 March 2010
Source: truthout

Al Gore penned a lengthy New York Times op-ed entitled, "We Can't Wish Away Climate Change," on February 28, 2010. As expected, Gore was wordy, made no effort to discuss the planet's top polluter (US Department of Defense), and, most of all, the former vice president once again opted to ignore the No. 1 cause of climate change: the meat-based diet. In fact, I ran a search on the nearly 2,000 words, but none of the following terms were found: meat, cow, livestock, methane, farm, diet or vegan.

Accepting the (unfortunate) reality that Al Gore is the planet's best-known climate change spokesperson, he has yet again squandered an ideal opportunity to educate, inform and provoke real change. Just as they served burgers and hot dogs at the Gore-inspired Live Earth concerts in 2007, the high-profile, green crowd simply refused to accept the convenient truth: According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, "the livestock sector generates more greenhouse gas emissions as measured in CO2 equivalent - 18 percent - than transport. It is also a major source of land and water degradation."

Yes, it's much more than just climate change. What about the aforementioned water degradation? As the Sierra Club explained, groundwater is "frequently contaminated by factory farm pollution, generally in the form of nitrates. Nitrate pollution, which can cause serious human health problems, seeps out of manure lagoons and into community sources of drinking water."

Let's consider deforestation. "In the Amazon the cattle sector is the largest driver of rainforest destruction, accounting for 60 to 70 percent of deforestation," wrote Nikolas Kozloff, author of "No Rain in the Amazon: How South America's Climate Change Affects the Entire Planet." "To put it in concrete terms: every eighteen seconds on average one hectare of Amazon rainforest is being lost to cattle ranchers. As if the carbon emissions resulting from cattle deforestation were not enough, consider bovine methane emissions."

As a result, the meat-based diet also plays a role in habitat destruction, animal and plant extinctions, world hunger and corporate welfare. Still, since climate change is the eco-topic most familiar to the general public, it may be the ideal place for Al Gore to start this discussion.

As vegan musician Moby explained, omitting the role of animals raised for food from efforts to address climate change is "like talking about lung cancer without talking about cigarettes."

How much longer can the world's best known environmentalist ignore such an issue?

In an open letter to Al Gore, Pamela Rice of the Viva Vegie Society wrote:

We're changing our light bulbs. We're buying high-mileage cars. We're dreaming up new green businesses to reduce the shoe-size of our ecological footprint. But even if we do all of this, a silent trend is working in the background that surely will wipe out all of our gains. We're eating too much meat - meat that from a health standpoint is far in excess. And the world is on a trajectory to double its consumption of meat by mid-century. Indeed, all of our efforts to cut greenhouse emissions will be wiped out if we don't reduce our meat consumption. And people need to hear this from you, Mr. Gore, as the person with the most credibility to get this fact out there. If they hear it from you, they will listen. It is an environmental imperative for humans to reduce their consumption of animal-based foods.

Simple Suggestion for Al Gore: A slow, but steady, introduction into his talks and articles regarding the role of the meat-based diet in climate change. You can even use a mainstream source: Henning Steinfeld, chief of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization's Livestock Information and Policy Branch and senior author of the report, who said, "Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today's most serious environmental problems. Urgent action is required to remedy the situation."
Reactions:

Welcome to the Jungle: Visiting Peru’s Manu Biosphere Reserve

Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Source: Tonic

While the Peruvian Amazon represents only 10 percent of the total 2.7 million square miles of the Amazon rain forest, Peru's Manu Biosphere Reserve is believed to have the highest concentration of bird species in the world (with 1,000-one out of every nine on Earth). The flora and fauna extend beyond birds, however, with 15,000 species of flowering plants, more than 200 species of mammals, 13 species of monkey and a colorful array of butterfly varieties.

The Manu Wildlife Center is considered by many to be the best place in Peru to view Amazonian wildlife. Its 22 private bungalows and community lodge with a dining room and bar makes a stay in the rain forest incredibly comfortable. Bungalow showers have hot water, even though you may prefer cooler temperatures in order to cool down from steamy jungle hikes. Every meal in the dining room is a tasty mix of Peruvian (from ceviche to potatoes in spicy cheese sauce) and international cuisine.

The best thing about this area is the wealth of wildlife viewing possibilities. Knowledgeable guides lead treks to view macaws, capybara, river otters, lowland tapirs, spider monkeys, poison-dart frogs and more. A trip to see these animals in their native habitat is something everyone should add to their bucket list.
Reactions:

Into the Peruvian Amazon with GreenTracks

10th March 2010
Source: PR-inside.com


GreenTracks has been working in the Peruvian Amazon for nearly twenty years and has an intimate knowledge of the rivers and flora and fauna as well as the people and cultures. A GreenTracks eco-adventure vacation is fun, stimulating and educational.

The Peruvian Amazon rainforest, comprising 60% of the country, is one of the most biologically diverse areas on the planet. Peru has the largest number of bird species and the third largest number of mammal species in the world. One in ten species in the world inhabit the Amazon rainforest. There are 32 species of primates in Peru, most of which live in the rainforest. The diversity of plant species is the highest on Earth and it is estimated one square kilometer may be home to 750 types of trees.

GreenTracks has been working in the Peruvian Amazon for nearly twenty years and has an intimate knowledge of the rivers and flora and fauna as well as the people and cultures. Through their years of experience they have put together a diverse set of programs that allow their travelers to choose a visit that will suit their interests. From upscale riverboat trips to more adventurous riverboat expeditions, from lodges with air conditioning to more rustic lodges and camping expeditions GreenTracks has it all.

GreenTracks offers Riverboat Cruises on the mighty Amazon River, tour programs to Manu, which boasts the highest bird, mammal, and plant diversity of any area on Earth, including 1,000 of the world's 9,700 bird species, 200 species of mammals, and 15,000 species of flowering plants; and the Tambopata-Madidi region where one can visit the great Tambopata National Reserve.

GreenTracks is the Inca Trail expert and, combined with Cuzco and Machu Picchu programs, can provide the trip of a lifetime. GreenTracks offers trips to other fascinating parts of Peru such as Lake Titicaca, Moche, Lambayeque, and Chachapoyas as well.

GreenTracks offers exciting programs for those seeking adventure in remote rainforest, wildlife enthusiasts, photographers, those interested in unique cultures, families wanting a different kind of vacation or anyone wanting destinations that will awe and inspire.
Reactions:

PERU: Suspension of Mining Operation Merely a Placebo

Mar 9, 2010
Source: Inter Press Service

Although the Peruvian government reported that it had suspended the exploration activities of the Afrodita mining company in the country's northern Amazon jungle region to avoid further protests by local indigenous people, officials took no actual steps to bring the firm's work to a halt.

So what really happened?

After a meeting of the Council of Ministers, Prime Minister Javier Velásquez and Minister of Energy and Mines Pedro Sánchez announced on Feb. 17 that the Peruvian company's permits to drill in the rainforest had been suspended.

The two officials said OSINERGMIN, Peru's mine and energy regulatory agency, had stated that the decision would be in effect until the company provided evidence that it had authorisation to use the land where the exploration activities are being carried out.

"We have reached a decision on the Minera Afrodita business," Velásquez repeated in parliament two days later. "OSINERGMIN just suspended the company's activities. And it is not like the company says - that we have given in to blackmail (by local indigenous protesters); what happened was that the firm did not comply with what is established by law."

Leaders from 52 native communities complain that the company has polluted two rivers in Awajun indigenous territory with the mercury and cyanide used in mining operations.

Afrodita has been exploring for gold and silver in the Cordillera del Cóndor mountain range in the northern province of Amazonas, 15 km from the Ecuadorean border, despite protests by the local Awajún Indians.

Many local members of the Awajún ethnic group were also involved in a two-month roadblock and protests near the northern jungle town of Bagua - also in Amazonas - that ended in a tragic clash with police on Jun. 5, 2009 in which at least 10 native demonstrators and 23 police officers were killed.

The mining boom in Peru that has resulted from soaring minerals prices over the last few years, and the passage of laws aimed at opening up the jungle to the extractive industries, have led to numerous conflicts between mining companies and native communities protesting the environmental and social effects of the mining industry.

After the government reported the suspension of Afrodita's activities, OSINERGMIN inspection and oversight chief Guillermo Shinno told IPS that the company could continue its prospecting operations as soon as it obtained a permit showing it had surface rights to the land in question.

"We have to clarify that OSINERGMIN has not brought the company's exploration activities to a halt; it merely sent the firm an official letter indicating that it cannot engage in such activities without a land-use permit," he said.

In its Feb. 11 letter to the company, the regulatory agency cited a document in which the Ministry of Energy and Mines informed the company that the Superintendencia de Bienes Nacionales (Superintendence of National Assets) had not issued Afrodita a permit granting it surface rights or ownership to the land where it has already begun to operate.

In other words, OSINERGMIN's letter merely notified the mining company that it needed a permit. The firm has not yet presented its request for the permit to the Superintendencia, sources in the government office told IPS.

In a statement, Afrodita said it would "temporarily" bring its drilling operations to a halt while the administrative problems were worked out.

But OSINERGMIN said that "no appeal is necessary, because no administrative steps have been taken" to stop the company's activities.

Afrodita also said that during the halt in activities, it would focus on analysing geological reconnaissance data collected in the area where it is prospecting mainly for gold and silver.

Minera Afrodita is owned by Peruvian geologist Carlos Ballón, who is also a director of the Cardero Group, the umbrella company that includes Dorato Resources.

Through a series of option agreements, Dorato Resources Inc., a Canadian mineral exploration company set up to focus on the Cordillera del Cóndor - described by the firm's web site as "one of the most important gold-bearing districts in the region since pre-Incan times" - has the right to acquire 100 percent of Afrodita, which has held seven concessions in the area since 1995.

Dorato says the option would involve "an extensive land package of approximately 800 square kilometres."

But the Peruvian constitution bans foreigners from owning property within 50 km of the border.

Canada is the second-largest investor in Peru, after Spain. The biggest Canadian company operating in this South American country is Barrick Gold, the world's largest gold miner.

Mining is one of the engines of the economy in Peru, which according to "Top Mining Companies in Peru" put out by the Peru: Top Publications publishing company, is the world’s leading producer of silver and tellurium, and is second in zinc, third in copper, tin and bismuth, fourth in lead, molybdenum and arsenic, and sixth in gold and selenium.

In a communiqué, Dorato said "The Peruvian government is stating that although Minera Afrodita has legitimate, long-standing mining claims and a valid drill permit, it does not own the surface rights and therefore cannot proceed with the previously permitted and officially endorsed drill programme.

"The company believes, based on legal advice, that this reasoning has no legal basis, as Minera Afrodita has only carried out exploration work on state-owned land, where such work is expressly authorised under Peruvian Mining Law pursuant to which no additional authorisation is required.

"The exploration authorisation was granted to Minera Afrodita in December 2009, after having agreed with the local population, in a public assembly in the Santa Maria de Nieva town, the undertaking of exploration activities in the area," it adds.

But OSINERGMIN clarified that what Afrodita obtained on Dec. 9, 2009 was approval of the environmental impact study for the mining project, and that to begin exploration work it also had to prove that it had ownership or surface rights to the property in question, according to the country's environmental regulations.

And in the case of communally owned indigenous territory, a permit granted by two-thirds of the local community is needed.

"Approval of the environmental assessment study is not sufficient to begin exploration operations; other permits are also needed," Shinno told IPS. He pointed out, for example, that the company also needs to apply for a water use permit.

The technical report by the Ministry of Energy and Mines explaining that the environmental impact study was approved clearly states that a land-use permit is needed.

On page 13, the report says "it is the responsibility of the Afrodita SAC mining company to have, before the start of exploratory activities, surface rights to the land where said activities are to take place."

The report, seen by IPS, also says that approval of the environmental impact study "does not constitute the granting of authorisation, permits or other legal requisites that the mining project must have before it begins operations."

Under OSINERGMIN regulations, Afrodita could be subject to sanctions for beginning exploration work without the required permits.

The prime minister took advantage of the company's failure to comply with the regulations to try to nip in the bud indigenous protests that threatened to spread once again in the country's Amazon jungle region.

The suspension of Afrodita's activities was one of the 16 demands that indigenous organisations of northern and eastern Peru set forth in a Feb. 22 protest.

But the Awajun are demanding more than a mere suspension of operations. They are worried about pollution of rivers and destruction of flora and fauna by mining industry activity in the area.

Their worries are not unfounded. In 2009, OSINERGMIN initiated legal procedures to sanction Afrodita for mismanagement of solid waste. The company has appealed. But the regulatory agency declined to provide further details.

For the Awajun people, the hill in the Cordillera del Cóndor where Afrodita has cleared four hectares of jungle represents Kumpanan or "powerful hill", considered to be the father of lightning and the owner of air and water, according to the Lima newspaper La República.

The Awajun (also known as Aguaruna) are the biggest native ethnic group in Peru's Amazon region and have a reputation as fierce warriors.

Their leaders have denounced that Afrodita pays soldiers from military barracks in the area to guard the company's operations, rather than protecting the local population.

The Awajun also reported a year ago that the El Tambo military post was used as a base of operations by the company. At that time, the tension was at its peak, because local native anti-mine protesters had taken several mine workers hostage after they entered Awajun territory without permission from the local communities. The hostages were released unharmed after a few days.

For now, the government's announcement of a suspension of operations would appear to be merely a pain-killer or even a placebo, because the central problem remains unsolved: Afrodita will be able to continue operating as soon as it takes care of the pending bureaucratic steps.
Reactions:

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Ecuador, Iran agree to build 3 hydroelectric centers

09.03.2010
Source: Trend News Agency

Ecuador and Iran agreed to build three hydroelectric centers in Ecuador, the Ecuadorian Presidency's office said Monday, Xinhua reported.

During an official visit of Ecuadorian Vice President Lenin Moreno to Iran over the last weekend, the representatives of both countries decided to construct three hydroelectric centers in Ecuador by using Iranian technology, with a hydroelectric generation capacity of more than 100 megawatts.

Acknowledging that both countries are geographically far apart, the Presidency's office said that there should nevertheless be more visits between the two countries to enhance bilateral cooperation in trade, investment, tourism, society, culture and sports.

Ecuador and Iran have cooperated in the port, agriculture and auto industries since 2008.

Moreno visited Tehran from Friday to Sunday. His visit aimed to promote the ecological Yasuni-ITT program. The program was launched to forgo the exploitation of oil fields in Ecuador's Yasuni National Park in the Amazon rainforest, in exchange for international funds to support its transition toward a more sustainable economy.
Reactions:

Science in the Amazon

Mar 8, 2010
Source: UC Berkeley

The boys from the Amazonian orphanage decided to name themselves Los Científicos. The Scientists.

It was a small but monumental achievement for Rick Henrikson and Richard Novak, two Berkeley bioengineering graduate students. The pair cofounded Future Scientist, a tiny but highly motivated aid organization whose mission is to teach science and practical technical skills to young people in rural, developing regions.

Last August, Novak, Henrikson and nine other Future Scientists traveled to Peru for their first pilot project: teaching a two-week crash course on pathogenic microorganisms, disease transmission, optics and solar-powered electricity to schoolchildren living along the Amazon River.

“We don’t want to do charity,” Novak, 24, explains. “The problem with many global aid organizations is that they’re product based. They donate resources, but the resources eventually run out. The large piece of equipment breaks and no one knows how to repair it. We’re taking a different approach.”

Arriving by boat, the Berkeley visitors proffered simple science lessons of a practical nature, purely optional. Thirty children from the Casa Girasoles Orphanage and community of Puerto Alegría showed up to their informal school.

Together, teachers and students collected water near the village and viewed it under microscopes schlepped from California. They identified invisible organisms that make people sick, talked about water pollution and practiced simple filtration techniques. They examined the microscopes themselves, learned how they’re built, how to work them and what useful things they reveal. (The microscopes and other equipment were later given to the community school.) The children played with magnifying glasses and learned the basics of optics.

Next, the teachers brought out small, solar panel kits to collect solar energy. The group made solar-powered radios, exploring electromagnetic waves and radio transmission. In this part of the world, with no reliable electricity, they soldered wire and assembled electrical components, then danced to the music gleaned from the airwaves. Finally, the children formed teams to compete in a solar oven–building contest.

To measure their work, the Berkeley teachers surveyed the children before and after the lessons; their results showed the material was sticking. “They were excited about what they were learning,” Novak reports. The nascent organization hopes to empower children with enough practical know-how so that, 10 years from now, these young adults can address their community’s needs—good health, electricity, sanitation, jobs—with solutions of their own.

Henrikson, 26, first saw a need for outreach to rural areas when he volunteered for a community health care organization in the Dominican Republic. Henrikson, who has a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from MIT, became a reluctant object of admiration among the people he met there. “They saw the benefit of a science education, and I was moved to do something that would support that need,” he says.

When he arrived at Berkeley, Henrikson met Novak, a fellow first-year graduate student in bioengineering with a bachelor’s degree in biology from Emory University. Between high school and college, Novak had worked at a research station deep in the Amazon. He watched as malaria sickened nearly half the local population and observed firsthand the consequences of ignorance about concepts as simple as disease transmission. Novak and Henrikson became roommates and spent long hours discussing ideas for how to help.

In the meantime, they volunteered for a science outreach program to Bay Area schools and met bioengineers similarly motivated: Tyson Kim, Sisi Chen, Frankie Myers, Gautham Venugopalan—eight graduate students in all—plus two professional engineers and a high school science teacher. Someone knew someone who had a contact at the Casa Girasoles Orphanage in Peru, and plans coalesced.

In January 2009, Future Scientist was born. Later, the group won funding from the Clinton Global Initiative and other donors, enough to buy equipment for their first batch of science lessons. Airfare to Peru and other travel expenses would come out of members’ own pockets.

A shoestring budget didn’t prevent the travelers from making the most of their time in the Amazon. When they weren’t teaching lessons, the group met with local teachers and health care workers to survey people’s needs, an important part of Future Scientist’s collaborative approach.

Back in Berkeley, the group is fundraising and writing a business plan while refining its curriculum and developing new hands-on science lessons. The next step is to recruit more volunteers to teach in the Amazon and continue the work launched last August.

Two members of Future Scientist returned to the Amazon last month to launch a new project (and blog about it). They’re installing a customized biogas digester system and teaching the villagers how to run it, hoping to spark a cottage industry there. Digesters, already employed in many parts of the developing world, are airtight tanks that convert farm scraps, human waste and organic matter into methane-based cooking fuel and nitrogen-rich fertilizer through anaerobic digestion. It’s a low-cost and sustainable way to improve sanitation and kill pathogens. Simple science sustaining life in the rainforest.
Reactions:

Seed-dispersing animals 'at risk from deforestation

Mar 8, 2010
Source: Cool Earth

Fruit-eating animals that disperse the seeds of rainforest plants are threatened by a number of factors, including deforestation, hunting, mining and road construction, according to an activist.

Speaking to mongabay.com, French tropical ecologist Pierre-Michel Forget commented that a decline in wildlife abundance and local extinction should be the main focuses for ecologists, rather than extinction on a global scale.

"Some natural parks and reserves now lack the large ungulates, primates and birds that disperse seeds," he said.

Mr Forget added: "If spider monkeys are protected in a remote forest of the Peruvian Amazon, it won’t help much those trees of French Guiana."

Instead, he said, conservation programmes that are region-specific are likely to be the best course of action to promote natural diversity.

A new EU green paper was recently released, detailing the challenges impacting forests in Europe.

This publication follows a white paper which was released last year and adopted by the European Commission in April 2009.
Reactions: